Post by thread:Rolling codes gather no moss...

Ian Rozowsky wrote: > > > Keeloq's encryption is not technically rolling code, but rather code > hopping. The rolling code algorithms supposedly originated in the US, > whereas code hopping was developed in S.A. I know Mchip calls it 'code hopping' in the same way they call EEPROM PICs 'flash'. It is also like some of these new RF chipsets that claim to be 'spread spectrum'. Technically it can be defended (a few rf channels), but then FSK could also be called 'spread spectrum'. The South African company who developed it, is Nanoteq http://www.nanoteq.com -- Friendly Regards /"\ \ / Tjaart van der Walt X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN spam_OUTtjaartTakeThisOuTwasp.co.za / \ AGAINST HTML MAIL |--------------------------------------------------| | WASP International | |R&D Engineer : GSM peripheral services development| |--------------------------------------------------| | Mobile : .....tjaartKILLspam@spam@sms.wasp.co.za (160 text chars) | | http://www.wasp.co.za/~tjaart/index.html | |Voice: +27-(0)11-622-8686 Fax: +27-(0)11-622-8973| | WGS-84 : 26¡10.52'S 28¡06.19'E | |--------------------------------------------------|