'Re: Other MicroControllers (with C support)'
| The new Avocet compiler has floating point math for the PIC. Free
beta copy at:
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Other MicroControllers
Author: Werner Terreblanche <PLESSEY.CO.ZA> at Internet_Exchange wterreb
Date: 3/20/97 9:11 AM
Troy Powledge <ERAMP.NET> wrote: tpow
> My question pertains to the use of other microcontrollers.
> Why is the MicroChip PIC controller so much better than other =
> controllers like ATMEL or ZILOG? Is there an application that would be
> better suited to one of the other manufacturers? I am kind of new to
> the microcontroller world and I see that there are quite a few =
> manufacturers. On what grounds do these companies compete? I really
> just want verification that I have gotten lucky and chosen the best
> controller out there. Thanks in advance, Troy Powledge
I do not neccessary think that the PIC microcontroller is
neccesarily the best microcontroller in general, but I like them
because you get such a wide variety all with different flavours
which makes them ideal for a large number of uses. Also, as far as
cost is concerned they are fast, reliable, cheap, easy to use and
programming tools and compilers are readily available. I use them
whenever the job is a reasonably small and easy to implement, or
whenever I really need the speed that a PIC can offer.
But for more complicated jobs I still prefer the 8051 or Atmel
microcontrollers. The main reason is that I like to program in high
level languages likes C and the compilers you get for the 8051 type
of microcontrollers are miles ahead of the ones you get for the PIC.
To put this to a test, try finding a PIC C compilers that can do
floating point arithmetic.
Anyway, PIC micronontrollers are a good point to start, and depending
on you application it might just yet turn out the best choice for
you! : )
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1997
, 1998 only
- New search...