'Re: Aghhh Code Protection Bit Problem'
In message <ccmail.microchip.com> 00002C8F.1332MITVMA.MIT.EDU writes: PICLIST
> The things that we have done to the code protection are all towards
> the goal of having the most secure device possible.
> Unfortunately, there is no where near enough volume in windowed JW
> parts to justify doing seperate silicon for those. So, the price for
> protection is the loss of an occasional JW device.
Nor would we (I) want seperate silicon. It is useful knowing
that we use the same silicon in production - no wories about
different silicon bugs.
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1997
, 1998 only
- New search...