Bob Blick wrote:
> Does anyone else think Nabble is a net negative?
>
> Did anyone who is now subscribed to the piclist start posting from
> Nabble originally? Would you have subscribed without Nabble?
>
> Because I think Nabble has negatively impacted the piclist. Not bigtime,
> but a little bit.
Why is it "net negative"? Is this one of your attempts to make PicList a
tightly policed private "PIC-only" club? ;)
I subscribed the "normal" way, but I find Nabble useful when searching
PicList archives. Often when googling for something, I find the answer in a
PicList post, courtesy of Nabble.
Have you noticed the posts from Nabble? Xiaofan won't even bother
replying if it's posted from Nabble, and I can relate. I know it's
stereotyping, but it's a useful (and flawed of course) tool for admins.
Teachers also stereotype their students, and since I was a teacher it's
a tool I am familiar with.
Teachers are close enough to police, so you made a good call :)
> Bob Blick wrote:
>> Does anyone else think Nabble is a net negative?
>>
>> Did anyone who is now subscribed to the piclist start posting from
>> Nabble originally? Would you have subscribed without Nabble?
>>
>> Because I think Nabble has negatively impacted the piclist. Not bigtime,
>> but a little bit.
>
> Why is it "net negative"? Is this one of your attempts to make PicList a
> tightly policed private "PIC-only" club? ;)
>
> I subscribed the "normal" way, but I find Nabble useful when searching
> PicList archives. Often when googling for something, I find the answer in a
> PicList post, courtesy of Nabble.
>
> Vitaliy
>
Nope, and in fact I use it occasionally to post references to older
threads in the piclist (I haven't had as much success with other
archives as I've had with Nabble in terms of finding posts and speed)
> Did anyone who is now subscribed to the piclist start posting from
> Nabble originally? Would you have subscribed without Nabble?
I subscribed directly, but if you're asking if Nabble is a source of
subscribers, I'd guess that there must be a few people who joined
after reading posts on Nabble. I suspect a search of email addresses
and headers would show whether someone posted via nabble before
posting via .....piclistKILLspam@spam@mit.edu, but you wouldn't be able to detect this
if they saw it on nabble and joined piclist before posting.
I can't think of the reverse happening - people leaving because of
what they saw coming from Nabble, but it sounds like at least one
piclist member actively ignores posts from nabble. I'm sure there are
many people on the piclist that have at least one other member in the
blacklist, though, so this is particularly compelling evidence of
badness.
> Because I think Nabble has negatively impacted the piclist.
Well, of the posts I can immediately search (back to september 2005,
so about 3 years) there have been 265 threads that have involved the
word "nabble" in either the footer, to: or from:, or other header, or
someplace else in the body. Now some of those were people simply
referring to posts, as opposed to people posting from Nabble. The few
that I sampled were not offensive by any measure I could think of, and
appeared to be suitable (ie, on topic) for the list. But I'm sure
there have been posts that are mis-tagged, or off-topic. Fortunately,
those that don't bother to correctly tag posts end up bothering only
those members that want to receive all messages, including untagged
messages.
Further, there were over 9,300 threads during that time, so threads
with even a mention of nabble account for less than 3% of the list
threads.
So, I guess I don't know where you're coming from. Has Nabble always
been a problem from the time it started archiving the piclist, or is
something new happening? Are people complaining? I know posters who
won't touch a thread once certain individuals have posted to it, but
nothing is done, so what makes nabble any different than a slightly
odd, very eccentric, scatterbrained member?
> Not bigtime, but a little bit.
There's always another 1% of optimization to be had. It's nice,
however, that this little problem is your biggest concern right now -
sounds like the piclist is going ok.
Bob Blick wrote:
> Have you noticed the posts from Nabble? Xiaofan won't even bother
> replying if it's posted from Nabble, and I can relate. I know it's
> stereotyping, but it's a useful (and flawed of course) tool for admins.
> Teachers also stereotype their students, and since I was a teacher it's
> a tool I am familiar with.
OMG, poor kids! :)
BTW, thanks for mentioning that you were a teacher at some point in your
career, it really helps put things in perspective (regarding your views on
taxes, government, minimum wage, etc).
> Teachers are close enough to police, so you made a good call :)
I really hope you won't use your position of authority to impose your
particular vision of PICList on the other inhabitants of this diverse
marketplace of ideas. :)
> I can't think of the reverse happening - people leaving because of
> what they saw coming from Nabble, but it sounds like at least one
> piclist member actively ignores posts from nabble.
When he mentioned it, he was using it as an indicator of posts not worth
taking his limited amount of time to reply to. So I started paying
attention, and basically I have to agree.
> There's always another 1% of optimization to be had. It's nice,
> however, that this little problem is your biggest concern right now -
> sounds like the piclist is going ok.
The piclist is always OK, my personal PID loop still needs tuning, I am
still oscillating wildly :)
Vitaliy wrote:
> Bob Blick wrote:
>> Teachers also stereotype their students, and since I was a teacher it's
>> a tool I am familiar with.
>
> OMG, poor kids! :)
I'm fairly troll-resistant tonight, so that doesn't bother me.
> BTW, thanks for mentioning that you were a teacher at some point in your
> career, it really helps put things in perspective (regarding your views on
> taxes, government, minimum wage, etc).
I think the main influence being a teacher had on me was learning to
assess people from various cues. I got pretty good at figuring out
someone's IQ and what way they needed information delivered to them.
My views on the other topics you mentioned were not necessarily formed
by being a teacher, and in truth I was trolling anyway so my real views
are still my own.
>> Teachers are close enough to police, so you made a good call :)
>
> I really hope you won't use your position of authority to impose your
> particular vision of PICList on the other inhabitants of this diverse
> marketplace of ideas. :)
Haven't I already? It's been years since I posted on [OT] and look at me
now.
>>
>> Have you noticed the posts from Nabble? Xiaofan won't even bother
>> replying if it's posted from Nabble, and I can relate.
The nice thing about a fairly large mailing list like piclist. For
each highly skilled poster (Xiaofan, Olin, Bob, Scott, etc) who
doesn't have the patience or inclination to answer stupid questions
from rank newbies, there are (or at least there ought to be) several
people of lesser skills that are still adequate to answer those
questions. It's almost like this is the "pay forward" price of
admission - if you want to ask difficult questions and get answers
from the experts, it's your duty to answer the questions you are
capable of answering.
I notice this on the CadSoft EAGLE forums as well; I suspect the
cadsoft employees would go crazy answering the same stupid questions
over and over again, but they don't have to. Various people in their
user community help out.
In some sense, this is what makes a list/forum successful. Lists
were there are a small number of people answering questions, and
large number of people asking questions, tend to be boring. And then
they fail, because the people with the answers get tired.
Vitaliy wrote:
> Bob Blick wrote:
>> Have you noticed the posts from Nabble? Xiaofan won't even bother
>> replying if it's posted from Nabble, and I can relate. I know it's
>> stereotyping, but it's a useful (and flawed of course) tool for admins.
>> Teachers also stereotype their students, and since I was a teacher it's
>> a tool I am familiar with.
>
> OMG, poor kids! :)
>
> BTW, thanks for mentioning that you were a teacher at some point in your
> career, it really helps put things in perspective (regarding your views on
> taxes, government, minimum wage, etc).
Why is every post you make distill everything to taxes, government,
minimum wage, etc?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin" <martinKILLspamnnytech.net>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <.....piclistKILLspam.....mit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Nabble - bad?
<snip>
>
> Why is every post you make distill everything to taxes, government,
> minimum wage, etc?
>
> -
> Martin
<snip>
After reading this I checked on his post and out of the last 72 or 73
I found about 12 that talked about the subjects you stated. And most
of these were in response to statements by others. I do not think this
makes every post he makes distill everything to taxes, government,
minimum wage, etc.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin" <EraseMEmartinspam_OUTTakeThisOuTnnytech.net>
> To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclistspam_OUTmit.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [OT] Nabble - bad?
>
>
> <snip>
>> Why is every post you make distill everything to taxes, government,
>> minimum wage, etc?
>>
>> -
>> Martin
> <snip>
> After reading this I checked on his post and out of the last 72 or 73
> I found about 12 that talked about the subjects you stated. And most
> of these were in response to statements by others. I do not think this
> makes every post he makes distill everything to taxes, government,
> minimum wage, etc.
>
> Derward
>
>
>
>
>
Just the ones I read, then. You have a lot of free time.
Funny NYPD wrote:
> I cannot tell which mail is from nabble, is there special stamp
> somewhere?
In the first email there will be a footer like this:
View this message in context:
www.nabble.com/3-Phase-PWM-using-16f777-please-help-tp19118657p19118657.html
Sent from the PIC - [PIC] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Martin wrote:
>> Bob Blick wrote:
>>> Teachers also stereotype their students, and since I was a teacher it's
>>> a tool I am familiar with.
>>
>> BTW, thanks for mentioning that you were a teacher at some point in your
>> career, it really helps put things in perspective (regarding your views
>> on
>> taxes, government, minimum wage, etc).
>
> Why is every post you make distill everything to taxes, government,
> minimum wage, etc?
I'm sorry it looks to you that way. I do have a strong interest in
economics, however I disagree with your assessment. I have many other
interests.
I think it may be difficult to understand my comment unless you put it in
the proper context. Bob Blick made posts regarding the same exact subjects,
and his views on those subjects are very different from mine. I believe that
fundamentally, the differences have to do with the fact that my views
originate with my experiences as a business owner, and Bob's by his
experiences as a teacher.
> I think it may be difficult to understand my comment unless you put it in
> the proper context. Bob Blick made posts regarding the same exact subjects,
> and his views on those subjects are very different from mine. I believe that
> fundamentally, the differences have to do with the fact that my views
> originate with my experiences as a business owner, and Bob's by his
> experiences as a teacher.
I think you oversimplify and make assumptions about me that have little
bearing in reality. Teaching has been only a part of my career, and I
have also been a small business owner like yourself. The only
irrefutable truth I can point out is that I have had a longer and more
varied career, so I feel can speak with experience from more angles than
you. If you are interested in baiting me, good luck, I'm used to telling
kids to get off my lawn. But as amusing as it may be to them, the whole
piclist doesn't need to hear it. And last night a ceiling joist broke in
my house and a roof truss poked through the ceiling, so I should get
back in the attic and try to do what I can do to fix it.
Bob Blick wrote:
> I think you oversimplify and make assumptions about me that have little
> bearing in reality. Teaching has been only a part of my career, and I
> have also been a small business owner like yourself. The only
> irrefutable truth I can point out is that I have had a longer and more
> varied career, so I feel can speak with experience from more angles than
> you.
Bob, you don't know me well enough to make such assertions. Being older
doesn't necessarily mean being wiser, or being right, for that matter.
> If you are interested in baiting me, good luck, I'm used to telling
> kids to get off my lawn.
I don't know what about what I said you consider "bait".
FWIW, I don't ever recall trying to belittle you, or calling you a troll, or
saying that your statements are B.S.
> But as amusing as it may be to them, the whole
> piclist doesn't need to hear it.
Should I take it to mean that you want the last word?
> And last night a ceiling joist broke in
> my house and a roof truss poked through the ceiling, so I should get
> back in the attic and try to do what I can do to fix it.
I am sorry to hear about your troubles. Good luck with the repairs.
Vitaliy wrote:
> Bob Blick wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> And last night a ceiling joist broke in
>> my house and a roof truss poked through the ceiling, so I should get
>> back in the attic and try to do what I can do to fix it.
>>
>
> I am sorry to hear about your troubles. Good luck with the repairs.
>
> Vitaliy
>
>
And what I want to know is how a PIC can be used as part of the
solution.... ;-)
> And last night a ceiling joist broke in
> my house and a roof truss poked through the ceiling, so I should get
> back in the attic and try to do what I can do to fix it.
>
> Cheerful regards,
> Bob
>
I can't even envision the events leading to that scenario,
Clay roof tiles? tree? wind load and no toenails or hurricane straps?
missing collar ties?
D
Oh, I want to jump in here so bad,,, my darkangle (left shoulder, keeper of my reputation) and the mute one on my right sholder are in a fight with my head in the middle. So, I just need to let you know, in the interest of good form, I'll not jump in.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 07:42:56PM -0400, Dave Lagzdin wrote: {Quote hidden}
> 2008/8/27 Bob Blick <spamBeGonebobblickspamBeGoneftml.net>
>
> > And last night a ceiling joist broke in
> > my house and a roof truss poked through the ceiling, so I should get
> > back in the attic and try to do what I can do to fix it.
> >
> > Cheerful regards,
> > Bob
> >
>
> I can't even envision the events leading to that scenario,
> Clay roof tiles? tree? wind load and no toenails or hurricane straps?
> missing collar ties?
> Vitaliy wrote:
>> Bob Blick wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>> And last night a ceiling joist broke in
>>> my house and a roof truss poked through the ceiling, so I should get
>>> back in the attic and try to do what I can do to fix it.
>>>
>> I am sorry to hear about your troubles. Good luck with the repairs.
>>
>> Vitaliy
>>
>>
>
> And what I want to know is how a PIC can be used as part of the
> solution.... ;-)
>
> Rolf
You know when you are at the lumber yard and there's a pile of 2x4
lumber that's been picked through already, and nobody will buy it
because it's broken? They build houses with it, with no regard for where
the worst pieces are used. And there's a part of the roof where they
start doing multiple angles and one of the trusses had an intersection(I
don't know the correct term) about 6 inches away from an interior
bearing wall, and the ceiling joist happened to have an incredibly weak
spot right there, and the load must have been pretty high probably due
to the unusual combination of angles. And for some reason ceiling joists
in this type of construction are just 2x4 and it sheared with a bang,
breaking through the sheetrock ceiling. So I have it jacked up and I'm
sistering all the wood in that area.
> 2008/8/27 Bob Blick <TakeThisOuTbobblickEraseMEspam_OUTftml.net>
>
>> And last night a ceiling joist broke in
>> my house and a roof truss poked through the ceiling, so I should get
>> back in the attic and try to do what I can do to fix it.
>>
>> Cheerful regards,
>> Bob
>>
>
> I can't even envision the events leading to that scenario,
> Clay roof tiles? tree? wind load and no toenails or hurricane straps?
> missing collar ties?
> D
Bob Blick wrote:
> Perhaps remote temperature monitoring? It's been about 125 F up there
> all day. I've had to stop until it cools down.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bob
>
Dang! And it seemed like such a good idea to put that chain hoist up
there to pull your engine...
> > And last night a ceiling joist broke in
>
> I can't even envision the events leading to that scenario,
> Clay roof tiles? tree? wind load and no toenails or hurricane straps?
> missing collar ties?
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Jinx <RemoveMEjoecolquittTakeThisOuTclear.net.nz> wrote:
>> > And last night a ceiling joist broke in
>>
>> I can't even envision the events leading to that scenario,
>> Clay roof tiles? tree? wind load and no toenails or hurricane straps?
>> missing collar ties?
>
> Maybe Rodent Of Unusual Size popped in
Oh, I don't think they actually exist.
Josh
--
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools.
-Douglas Adams
Yes. BUT do you know where the name came from? *
One of the better tales told.
Layers within layers.
And the book has a layer, that the movie cannot easily add,
that is not what it seems.
(My brain says that I'm possibly partially mixing stories.
Maybe not. No matter ... :-) ).
Russell
ROUS fire swamp dread pirate roberts
enough already ...
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Jinx <EraseMEjoecolquittclear.net.nz> wrote:
> >> > And last night a ceiling joist broke in
> >>
> >> I can't even envision the events leading to that scenario,
> >> Clay roof tiles? tree? wind load and no toenails or hurricane straps?
> >> missing collar ties?
> >
> > Maybe Rodent Of Unusual Size popped in
>
> Oh, I don't think they actually exist.
>
> Josh
> --
> A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
> completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
> fools.
> -Douglas Adams