>
> I finished a program recently in PicBasicPro, and found it easy to use. I
> guess the biggest constraint in my mind was interrupts -or rather the
> difficulty in implementing them. Basically (no pun intended), it was not
> recommended. Having done some C programming in the far distant past, I
> thought it would be worth a try doing it on a Pic. After checking to see if
> the CCS C would generate the COD file needed for debugging with my
> Tech-Tools emulator (which it does), I purchased a copy of the full version
> of CCS C. This includes the dos and windows versions along with an ide.
> After having read the manual for CCS, I have to state that I am not sure I
> will ever use it. While CCS C does a much better job at handling interrupts
> (you can selectively turn them on or off as if you were in assembly), it
> falls flat on it's face by not having a byte in/out instruction - unless I
> am blind (which my wife does accuse me of quite often). CCS C does have a
> bit set/clear and a bit read instructions. In the current project I am
> working on, I want to interface a parallel LCD display - but the thought of
> having to transfer data a bit at the time to a port is more than I care to
> handle.
>
> Am I missing something, or shall I go back to PBP and be happy?
> Thanks,
>
> David V. Fansler
> Network Administrator
> TriPath Imaging, Inc. (Formerly AutoCyte, Inc)
> 336-222-9707 Ext. 261
>
dfansler
KILLspamautocyte.com <
.....dfanslerKILLspam
.....autocyte.com>
> Now Showing!
http://www.mindspring.com/~dfansler
> <
http://www.mindspring.com/~dfansler>
> Updated February 7,2000
> Ann's Cancer & David's Observatory