>I think reactor subproducts  are second source for weapons, so not only
>electrical power should be considered when talking about cash flow. Besides
>having nuclear reactors means POWER and not only electric power and that
>have no price.
>What do you think about ?
>
>Rodolfo.
>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: piclist-bouncesRemoveMEmit.edu [spamBeGonepiclist-bounces@spam@RemoveMEmit.edu]En nombre de
>RussellMc
>Enviado el: Saturday, April 14, 2012 10:52 PM
>Para: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
>Asunto: Re: [TECH] Nuclear Power plant additions approved
>
>
>If the plant makes 2200 MW 24/7 year after year,
>if fuel costs $0,
>if maintenance costs $0,
>if staff costs $0,
>if interest rate of borrowed money is 0.0000000%,
>if there are no
>    accidents
>    or other costs such as
>        waste disposal,
>        site remediation,
>        security,
>        insurance [tm] etc
>not in the $14M
>OR if any of the above are fully costed using standard DCF into the $14B
>
>then
>
>at $0.05/unit whole sale breakeven occurs in 348 years.
>At $1.00 per unit it's 17 years.
>
>Anyone researching this please tell me where the loans, security
>insurance staff etc can be found at $0 *and I'll have some too.
>
>
>Russell
>
>* MAY be in the $14B.
>
>> articles.latimes.com/2012/feb/09/nation/la-na-nuclear-20120210
>>
>> #1  At 14 billion dollars for two reactors.... what is the breakdown of
>costs ?
>>     How much of this could be done off-site and be shipped to the site ?
>>     Why 14 billion dollars ?
>>
>> #2  What is the cash flow for this investment ?  Loan costs versus sale of
>electrical power ......
>>
>>