Peter,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:20:59 +0300 (IDT), Peter wrote:
{Quote hidden}>...
> The simplest EMP protection is that of having none. If someone zaps the
> chip in an object and it is subsequently discovered that the object has
> a non-responding chip then the cashier or equivalent will tap it in by
> hand, by EAN or barcode, as usual. This is not a problem for the shop or
> the system. Think about how many times the cashier has to tap in the EAN
> because the barcode reader does not work on a product (about 5% bad
> reads are valid even by barcode reader manufacturer standards for a
> variety of reasons). Anybody who expects to be able to walk out of a
> shop with, say, a bottle of milk, without paying, because the bottle's
> barcode did not register at the cashier's needs help.
Except that they are talking about not having a cashier as such, and not scanning each item individually, but
walking through a reader-portal with a trolleyful of items, which are all RFID-read "at once". There is
little or no advantage in replacing barcodes with RFID and then handling each item in the same way - the
advantage is in eliminating the one-at-a-time handling by a staff member. A 5% read-failure wouldn't be
tolerated in this case - and RFID wouldn't be implemented.
When the wheel-through portal is in use, then zapping RFIDs becomes a viable method of theft. Expect to see
some reaction from the retail trade if it starts happening!
Cheers,
Howard Winter
St.Albans, England